Cows Soil the President's Suit: The Problems of Campaigning on the Road

To see images of the original pages click:

Cover memop.1p.2p.3p.4p.5p.6p.7p.8p.9


Citation: Memo, Dorrance Smith to Doug Blaser, 7/26/76; folder "Press Office Improvement Sessions - 8/6-7/76 - Press Advance (2)," Box 24, Ron Nessen Papers, Gerald R. Ford Library.

THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
July 26, 1976

MEMORANDUM FOR DOUG BLASER

FROM: DORRANCE SMITH

Re: Attached Report

Attached please find my report which I hope will serve as constructive thoughts, distilled from the last ten months of on-the-road activity. My attempt is to offer suggestions based on my experiences to further serve the President in the upcoming months of campaigning.

I. PRIMARY SEASON REVIEW

The purpose of this report is to provide suggestions, based on analysis of Presidential travel, during the primaries, which may serve as guidelines for future travel during the upcoming campaign season.

In the eyes of the American public, the image of the President is derived from a kaleidoscope of different sources. The most important image-making sources are the video and stories that emanate from the White House and from the travels of the President.

Unfortunately, a large degree of the video that plays has been to the disadvantage of the image of the President. Consequently, there are numerous stories which we'd like to forget:

Each one of these items have one thing in common: they all reflect negatively on the President. These items do break down into two groups. Items numbered 1 - 7 are uncontrollable; incidents of this variety are simply going to happen. Items numbered 8 - 21 are controllable, some more so than others. In the last eight months no one person or group has made any overall, consistent effort to control the image to the end that the result has been an admixture of stories and related video which, though avoidable in many situations, took place and played to the disadvantage of our candidate.

It must be kept in mind that the response of the viewer is not to the man but to the image. Therefore, it becomes an absolute necessity that some one person or group maintain a constant vigil over the image and over the response. We have control over the candidate; we have partial control over the media. We have used neither of these elements of control to our advantage.

As a means of comparison, read through events numbered 8 - 21 again. Now try to itemize similar situations in the last eight months that have occurred to either Carter or Reagan.

II. BACKGROUND - A LESSON IN LOSING CONTROL

What can be learned from the President's activities in the primary season (January - June) as it relates to his image?

What type of picture are the American people being fed? First, it must be established that the picture is fuzzy. It is the kaleidoscope or hodgepodge of information that differs from Tacoma, Washington to Bangor, Maine. But, everyone has some picture or concept, and it is our job to determine: 1) What that picture is and, 2) how to control that picture to--our best advantage.

The best understanding of the overall image is through the analysis of television news coverage of the President. Television has taught us that it's not what you say that counts -- it's how the viewer receives the impression. In terms of television coverage, how much of the news came from within the White House versus on the road? At first glance one would say 72% versus 28% in terms of actual news coverage. But, the 72% figure is misleading as no news comes from the White House a full 1/3 of the days he's inside. Meaningful video of him is even more scarce. This means that only 77 days out of 160 days, news emanated from the White House, or less than 5O%. 51.8 of the network news coverage of the President presents him in on-the-road situations.

The problem with this situation is two-fold. Once, you lose control when you step out of the White House, and you lose the most powerful tool which we possess, the incumbency. Two, the video of the President on the road looks no different from the video of Jimmy Carter or Ronald Reagan or Mo Udall. When edited together in three or four minute packages on the nightly news, the President's video playing next to Reagan's video bears little or no difference save the Presidential Seal or Air Force One in the background.

In media terms the power of the Presidency or the power of the incumbency has been squandered in the primary process. Since that time we have appeared more Presidential with the aid of the Bicentennial and the Queen's visit. Similar Presidential type settings of this nature should be constructed now for September and October, strategically programmed and marketed so as to provide a constant backdrop unavailable to anyone but the President of the United States.

III. STRATEGY

There are two key concepts that are essential for projecting the proper image: control and coordination. Some group, be it Press Office, Communications Office, or PFC should assume overall command and responsibility for the President's image. This group should always be thinking in terms of how will it effect the perception of the President. Everything the President does should be controlled to the extent that the picture which plays is the picture that we want to play getting across the point which we want to make. But, in order to do this, we must be in control of the image.

Hand in hand with this is the need to coordinate the other areas that bear on the President's image so that they work to his advantage. For instance his advertising campaign should be coordinated with his travelling schedule and his speech writing so that the message is consistent. The elements that comprise these different operations should all work together and work towards the same goal.

The most poignant example for the need for control and coordination is that the media is constantly writing stories about the petty jealousies that exist between members of the White House Staff and/or the PFC. Before we hit the road in September and October, this situation needs to be rectified as the first attempt at coordinating these dissident elements. Believe it or not, sometimes we are all striving to reach the same goal!

IV. GAINING MORE CONTROL & COORDINATION ON THE ROAD

The travels of the last months have taught us a great many things which may serve to help the image in the upcoming campaign season. Obviously we lose an element of control over the news when the President leaves the White House. But there are a number of things that should be kept in mind to help get the proper image across:

V. SUMMARY

The examples listed in this report all lead to one fundamental conclusion: The President needs an image-maker or producer who coordinates the various elements which influence the viewers' perspective of the candidate so that the end product is an organized attempt at conveying that message that we want to get across. There exists in this Administration a serious need for someone to be constantly thinking in terms of the President's image as it relates to mass media. The thought process and strategy of Presidential travel should be produced for maximum effect. But this will not happen until the organizers of Presidential travel think in the terms that I've outlined. With an organized effort to coordinate the image and control the message, the end result or overall picture of our candidate should bear close resemblance to the picture that we're trying to achieve.

The role of the Press Advance Office should be the on-site coordination of the President's image to ensure that his activities are consistent with the overall idea. The press advanceman should be briefed by the image maker as to: 1) the reason for the trip, and, 2) the desired goal to be achieved from the trip or the overall scheme. The press advanceman's function then becomes one of coordinating the various elements on the road to achieve the desired goals. The press advanceman acts as the producer on the road, sensitive to the problems that directly relate to the President's image. The press advanceman must always be thinking in terms of media impact -- deadlines and feed times.

Unfortunately, sometimes decisions are made on the pre-advance or within the White House prior to the advance which lack a sensitivity to using the event in the best manner of promoting the President. In most cases the concerns of the locals and the people in the auditorium take precedent over the needs of the press who have an audience of millions, Presidential trips are not at this point produced for proper media impact. Therefore, by the time the press advanceman arrives on the scene, many of the decisions have already been made.

In my estimation, the overriding perspective should be that of the producer or image-maker.

Once established, all advance groups should work to further this perspective and guarantee that it becomes incorporated into all aspects of Presidential travel.


Return to the List of 1976 Campaign Documents

Search ButtonSearch the Ford Library & Museum website

Home Page ButtonGo to the Home Page

E-mail ButtonSend e-mail to the Ford Library

[ Search | Home Page | E-mail ]



Last Updated: August 19, 2004